The Bombay High Court ruled that a minimum three‑month gap must exist between a Section 73(2) show‑cause notice and the final order under Section 73(10) in GST proceedings. Orders passed earlier, such as the two‑and‑a‑half‑month order in the A.M. Marketplaces case, were quashed. The decision underscores procedural fairness and the need for adequate time for taxpayers to respond.
A minimum gap of three months must exist between the issuance of a show cause notice under Section 73(2) and the passing of the final order under Section 73(10).
The court quashed both the notice and the final order.
It allows taxpayers to understand the basis of the demand, consider voluntary payment within 30 days, prepare replies, seek adjournments, and participate in hearings.
Get VAT and indirect tax news delivered to your inbox twice a week.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hindu · 5 days ago
India’s GST rationalisation introduced a two‑tiered rate structure of 5% and 18% in September 2025, boosting domestic consumption. However, February 2026 saw a sharp rise in import IGST collections—up 17% YoY—driven by a weaker rupee and higher import costs, which may erode the price relief from the new rates.
Storyboard18 · 9 days ago
The Supreme Court of India ruled that Rooh Afza is a fruit drink under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, removing it from the residual category that had subjected it to a 12.5% VAT rate. The decision places the product under Entry 103 of Schedule II Part A, which historically attracted a 4% VAT rate for the assessment period 2008‑2012. The ruling emphasizes that tax classification must be based on statutory language, not food safety definitions.
BusinessToday · 20 days ago
The article explains that under current GST scrutiny, the eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) hinges on a consistent documentation trail rather than just invoices. Chartered accountant Nitin Kaushik outlines the types of records—purchase orders, GST invoices with e‑way bills, GRNs, bank statements, and GSTR filings—that authorities examine. He stresses that due diligence and alignment of all records can protect bona fide buyers from penalties.
DevDiscourse · 27 days ago
The Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) has urged the Indian government to reassess the 5% GST applied to ride‑hailing services, arguing it harms driver income and consumer affordability. IAMAI calls for exemptions for SaaS‑based mobility services and highlights confusion from contradictory state rulings. The association seeks dialogue with the GST Council and Finance Ministry to create a more sustainable framework for the sector.
Whalesbook · 27 days ago
India’s GST law imposes a 5% tax on ride‑hailing services, but the SaaS model used by aggregators creates ambiguity under Section 9(5) of the CGST Act. IAMAI has urged a review of the tax’s applicability, while Karnataka has exempted subscription‑based platforms such as Namma Yatri. The dispute raises uncertainty for aggregators, potentially leading to unexpected liabilities and affecting driver earnings and consumer affordability.
A2Z Taxcorp · 30 days ago
India's GST Council has granted an exemption on individual life and health insurance premiums, removing the 18% GST. The decision, announced in a written reply on 5 February 2026, covers all individual policies including family floater plans. IRDAI confirmed that insurers have passed the benefit to policyholders without raising premiums.
